A Functional Approach to Configural Frequency Analysis

Authors

  • Alexander von Eye Michigan State University
  • Patrick Mair Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v37i2.297

Abstract

Standard Configural Frequency Analysis (CFA) is a one-step procedure that determines which cells of a cross-classification contradict a base model. The results are possible types/antitypes depending on whether the observed cell frequencies are significantly lower/higher with respect to the base model. Selecting these cells out does not guarantee that the base model fits. Therefore, the role played by these cells for the base model is unclear, and interpretation of types and antitypes can be problematic. In this paper,  functional CFA is proposed. This model of CFA pursues two goals simultaneously. First, cells are selected out that constitute types and antitypes. Second, the base model is fit to the data. This is done using an iterative procedure that blanks out individual cells one at a time, until the base model fits or until there are no more cells that can be blanked out. In comparison to standard CFA, functional CFA is shown to be more parsimonious, that is, fewer types and antitypes need to be selected out. The methods are illustrated and compared using data examples from the literature.

References

Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Aksan, N., Goldsmith, H. H., Smider, N. A., Essex, M. J., Clark, R., Hyde, J. S., et al. (1999). Derivation and prediction of temperamental types among preschoolers.

Developmental Psychology, 35, 958-971.

Bauer, P., and Hackl, P. (1987). Multiple testing in a set of nested hypotheses. Statistics, 18, 345-349.

Funke, S., Mair, P., and von Eye, A. (2007). cfa: R package for the analysis of configuration frequencies [Computer software manual]. URL: http://cran.R-project.org.

Goodman, L. A. (1991). Measures, models, and graphical displays in the analysis of cross-classified data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 1085-1111.

Guti´errez-Pe˜na, E., and von Eye, A. (2000). A Bayesian approach to configural frequency analysis. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 24, 151-174.

Kieser, M., and Victor, N. (1991). A test procedure for an alternative approach to configural frequency analysis. Methodika, 5, 87-97.

Kieser, M., and Victor, N. (1999). Configural frequency analysis (CFA) revisited - a new look at an old approach. Biometrical Journal, 41, 967-983.

Kieser, M., and Victor, N. (2000). An alternative approach for the identification of types in contingency tables. Psychologische Beitr¨age, 42, 402-404.

Lehmacher, W. (1981). A more powerful simultaneous test procedure in configural frequency analysis. Biometrical Journal, 23, 429-436.

Lienert, G. A. (1968). Die Konfigurationsfrequenzanalyse als Klassifikationsmethode in der klinischen Psychologie. [Configural frequency analysis as classification method in clinical psychology.]. Paper presented at the 26. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Tübingen.

Mair, P. (2007). A framework to interpret nonstandard log-linear models. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 36, 1-15.

Mair, P., and von Eye, A. (2007). Application scenarios for nonstandard log-linear models. Psychological Methods, 12, 139-156.

Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., and Li, W. (2004). Applied Linear Statistical Models. Chicago: Irwin Press.

Netter, P. (1983). Typen sympathomedullärer Aktivität und ihrer psychischen Korrelate. In H. Studt (Ed.), Psychosomatik in Forschung und Praxis (p. 216-233). München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.

R Development Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Available from

http://www.R-project.org (ISBN 3-900051-07-0)

Victor, N. (1989). An alternative approach to configural frequency analysis. Methodika, 3, 61-73.

von Eye, A. (2002). Configural Frequency Analysis: Methods, Models, and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

von Eye, A. (2004). Base models for configural frequency analysis. Psychology Science, 46, 150-170.

von Eye, A., and Gutiérrez-Peña, E. (2004). Configural frequency analysis - the search for extreme cells. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31, 981-997.

von Eye, A., Mair, P., and Bogat, G. A. (2005). Prediction models for configural frequency analysis. Psychology Science, 47, 342-355.

von Eye, A., and Mun, E. Y. (2003). Characteristics of measures for 2£2 tables. Understanding Statistics, 2, 243-266.

von Eye, A., and Schuster, C. (1998). Regression Analysis for Social Sciences: Models and Applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

von Eye, A., and Schuster, C. (2000). Configural frequency analysis under retrospective and prospective sampling schemes: Frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Psychologische Beiträge, 42, 428-447.

von Weber, S., von Eye, A., and Lautsch, E. (2004). The Type II error of measures for the analysis of 2 £ 2 tables. Understanding Statistics, 3, 259-282.

Wurzer, M. (2005). An Application of Configural Frequency Analysis: Evaluation of the Uage of Internet Terminals. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Vienna.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Functional Approach to Configural Frequency Analysis. (2016). Austrian Journal of Statistics, 37(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v37i2.297