Some Statistics concerning the Austrian Presidential Election 2016

Authors

  • Erich Neuwirth Fakult\"at f\"ur Informatik, Universit\"at Wien
  • Walter Schachermayer Fakult\"at f\"ur Mathematik, Universit\"at Wien, Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, A-1090 Wien, Austria, and the Institute for Theoretical Studies, ETH Zurich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v45i3.596

Abstract

The 2016 Austrian presidential runoff election have been repealed by the Austrian constitutional court. The results of the counted votes had yielded a victory of Alexander van der Bellen by a margin of 30.863 votes as compared to the votes for Norbert Hofer. However, the constitutional court found that 77.769 votes were ``contaminated'' as there have been - at least on a formal level - violations of the legal procedure when counting those votes. For example, the envelopes were opened prematurely, or not all the members of the electoral board were present during the counting etc. Hence the court considered the scenario that the irregular counting of these votes might have caused a reversal of the result as {\it possible}. The constitutional court sentenced that this {\it possibility} presents a sufficient irregularity in order to order a repetition of the entire election.

While it is, of course, {\it possible} that the irregular counting of those 77.769 votes reversed the result, we shall show that the probability, that this indeed has happened, is ridiculously low.

References

bibitem{wahl16}

url{http://www.bmi.gv.at/cms/BMI_wahlen/bundespraes/bpw_2016/}

bibitem{EN}

url{http://www.wahlanalyse.com/WahlkartenDifferenzenVfGh.html}

bibitem{bruckmann}

Bruckmann, G. (1966). textit{Sch"atzung von Wahlresultaten aus Teilergebnissen} Wien: Physica-Verlag.

bibitem{ledl}

Ledl, Th. (2007). textit{Modellierung von Wechselw"ahlerverhalten als Multinomialexperiment} Dissertation, Fakult"at f"ur Wirtschaftswissenschaften und Informatik, Universit"at Wien. url{http://homepage.univie.ac.at/thomas.ledl/download/Dissertation.pdf}

bibitem{neuw84}

Neuwirth, E. (1984). textit{Sch"atzung von W"ahler"ubergangswahrscheinlich-keiten} In: M. Holler (Hg.) Wahlanalyse -- Hypothesen, Methoden und Ergebnisse. M"unchen: tuduv-Buch.

bibitem{neuw94}

Neuwirth, E. (1994). textit{Prognoserechnung am Beispiel der Wahlhochrechnung} In: P. Mertens. (Hg.) Prognoserechnung. W"urzburg-Wien.

bibitem{neuw2012}

Neuwirth, E. (2012), textit{Wahlhochrechnung: ein kurzer "Uberblick "uber den Einsatz bei bundesweiten Wahlen in "Osterreich}, in: "Osterreich 2032 (Festschrift zum 80. Geburtstag von Gerhart Bruckmann), Hrsg: Lutz, W. und Strasser, H., Verlag der "osterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 2012.

bibitem{vfgh}

Verfassungsgerichtshof, Freyung 8, A-1010 Wien, textit{W I 6/2016-125}, 1.~Juli~2016,

url{https://www.vfgh.gv.at/cms/vfgh-site/attachments/5/7/8/CH0003/CMS1468412977051/w_i_6_2016.pdf}

Downloads

Published

2016-09-28

How to Cite

Neuwirth, E., & Schachermayer, W. (2016). Some Statistics concerning the Austrian Presidential Election 2016. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 45(3), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v45i3.596

Issue

Section

Articles